For the woman who has asked herself for eleven months and him not once
Where Is This Going? — How to Talk About Commitment Without Scaring Either of You
How to ask where this is going — in a shape he can answer, at an hour you chose rather than the one it finally burst out of — and how to read what comes back.
Instant PDF Read it on anything One-time purchase
Sound familiar?
Written the way you would say it to a friend, not the way a manual would.
One job underneath all of them: get a true question out of your mouth, in a shape he can answer, and read honestly what comes back.
You do not have to deserve an answer.
On how long you have waited, and why it does not come into it
Where it starts
A paediatric nurse of twenty-nine, eleven months in with a man who fits out commercial kitchens. They have never had an argument; she would tell you that first, and mean it as evidence.
Her eleven months
June, in a taxi home from his cousin’s wedding, where she has been introduced all day as Danny’s — the possessive, then a change of subject. She gets as far as so. He says, “What?” She says, “Nothing. I’m shattered.” Both are true.
Then October, and a lease up in January, mentioned on a Wednesday as logistics, because logistics is the only register she trusts.
It cost her nothing and it bought her nothing.
His twenty seconds
He has just straightened up from taking his shoes off. He is not frightened of the question. He is doing arithmetic: how long has she been thinking this, was it the wedding, was it the lease in October — was that this?
And whatever he says next will be remembered and quoted, possibly for years, and he has had four pints and is standing in his socks.
The word she would have used is trapped. It is not one of the things in his head.
Nobody in that kitchen is behaving badly. The question was true, and had been for months; it simply arrived at twenty to twelve in the worst available shape, with neither of them ready. This is about the distance between those two things.
What it’s about
What is on offer here is narrower than a result and a great deal more useful: a question you can get out of your mouth, in a shape he can answer, at an hour you picked. A clear head about what comes back. And an accurate sense, six weeks later, of what you are in.
So it begins a long way before the conversation — in the months of not asking, in the signs you have been reading instead, and in the two questions that make the whole thing sayable: what you actually want to know, and what you would do with each answer. The second one is the work.
Then the conversation: the hour, the first thirty seconds, reading the answer you got rather than the one you had drafted, and stopping while it is still a good one. Then the part almost nobody writes about — the six weeks in which the real answer arrives or does not, unprompted, in things he had to choose to do.
What you decide at the end of it is yours. The job here is to get you better information than you have now, and to be straight about where it runs out.
After you’ve read it
The question, the hour, and the reading of the answer. Nothing that works by making him afraid of losing you.
“I’d rather know where I stand than find out in two years that you knew all along.”
Get it — $8.49Not where is this going. The thing underneath it, in one sentence short enough to say in fifteen seconds — which is often not the word you had fixed on.
Yes, no, not yet, don’t know. Four lines, each with a verb in it. The no line takes two weeks to write, never gets said out loud, and does all the work.
The same want, said two ways: one with an amount and a period and an implied account owing in it, and one that leaves him somewhere to stand other than the dock.
One question rather than three, a length said out loud and early, and the most useful sentence in it, which also happens to be true: I want an honest answer, not a decision today.
“We need to talk” costs you half of what you came for before you have finished saying it. Three jobs, thirty seconds, nothing to memorise.
The warm yes with a change of subject forty seconds later. The one entirely about March. And the no said kindly, which is information rather than a verdict on you.
What counts: something he had to choose to do, your name in a sentence about next year, an obstacle that moved. What does not, however lovely to hear: reassurance, a warm few weeks, the answer he already gave.
What’s in it
That is the shape of it, because that is the shape of the thing: the months leading up to it, the forty minutes of it, and the weeks that follow and actually decide.
Before it
Why you have not asked, which is almost never cowardice. The signs you have been reading instead of asking. The fear underneath, which on inspection is usually not a no at all. And the deadline you set by accident, and how to take it back. This is where the work gets done, which is why the asking turns out to be the easy part.
During it
Choosing the hour, and the four things that make one wrong. The opening, and the three jobs it has to do in thirty seconds. Saying what you want without it arriving as an invoice. Then reading what comes back: the easy yes, the quick warm one, the honest I don’t know, and the question he asks instead of answering.
After it
The two days nobody warns you about, when the urge to go back over it is strongest. Then six weeks of ordinary life, read once at the end rather than every Sunday. The yes where nothing changes. And how long is reasonable, which has one honest answer, and it is yours.
Played to the end
Continuous accounts, from the first sentence to wherever it settles. The yes that was real, and the yes where nothing changed. The man who said he needed time and meant it, and the one who said it and did not. The accidental deadline, taken back. The no, said kindly. Some end well, some badly, and several stay open — because if every one resolved, a real reader would close it feeling she had failed.
Its own tools
Done alone, on paper, never shown to anybody. They score nobody, least of all you.
Four fields, ten minutes, once. What you actually want to know. What you would do with each answer. What you are explicitly not asking for today, which is the field that keeps it survivable. Then the sentence itself, written last.
Output: a question short enough to say in fifteen seconds.
Five lines, decided before you go in: one question rather than three, a named length said out loud, what the hour is for, the sentence that ends it, and the thing you are not asking for.
Output: a conversation both of you can afford to start.
Four questions, asked once at the end of the six weeks rather than every Sunday, because daily measuring produces noise and noise produces conclusions. Plus the lovely things that do not count as evidence.
Output: the difference between what he said and what arrived.
From inside
She sits with a cold cup of tea and finds that she has been planning to ask a question for a year without ever once working out what she would do with half of the possible answers.
A man who starts talking about next year because he is frightened of losing you is not committing to you. He is managing a threat, and the thing he commits to is the end of the threat.
Same woman. Same man. Roughly the same words. Five days apart. One of those is an answer and one is not.
How it treats you
The whole bad version of this subject lives here. It is ruled out on the first pages, and then kept to.
Partly because it is unkind. The practical reason is stronger: a man who starts talking about next year because he is frightened of losing you has told you nothing about next year. What he commits to lasts exactly as long as the fear that produced it — and two months on you have a promise you cannot trust and no way of asking again.
What you get
How to Talk About Commitment Without Scaring Either of You
Questions
The length of the thing you say. The sentence you have been rehearsing in the car since March is four sentences long by now; the one you actually say is ten words and takes fifteen seconds. The hour it gets said in — a Saturday morning you chose, not twenty to twelve on a Monday with his shoes in his hand. And what you do afterwards, which is watch six weeks once rather than re-read one sentence every Sunday.
It will tell you what the answer is worth, which is the knowable part. The not-yet gets the most room: what it costs you while it runs, and how to tell a real one — a thing that has to happen first, with a name and a date on it — from a permanent one, which is the same sentence with nothing behind it. How long you let one run is yours, and it would be a cheek for anyone else to decide it.
They are real, and also unreliable: a cleared shelf, a phone face up on the table, a sentence about a garden he has no memory of saying. Eleven months of reading those produces a conclusion that turns over twice a week and costs you every Sunday evening. Fifteen seconds of asking produces something you can still use on Monday.
Then start at the forty-eight hours afterwards, when the urge to go back over it is strongest and most expensive, and at the deadline you set without meaning to and how to take one back out loud. The second conversation is written out in full, and it goes nothing like the first: same woman, same man, five weeks apart, and only one of the two is an answer.
A digital PDF, downloaded as soon as your PayPal payment is confirmed. Nothing is mailed and nothing recurs — $8.49 is paid once. If the download fails, email Harshriddles@gmail.com.
One thing, from the closing pages
It never gets said out loud — not in the kitchen, not in the car, not anywhere. It is load-bearing precisely because it is private: it is what takes the weight off the question, so the question can be ten words long on an ordinary Saturday.
The fact that it has to be asked for at all is a feature of living with another adult. It is not a failure of yours.
Get Where Is This Going? — $8.49Instant PDF One-time purchase Paid through PayPal
